We were unable to load Disqus. If you are a moderator please see our troubleshooting guide.

Nel • 1 year ago

"It was about 10 years ago when we were working on the original Drakengard that I thought about the meaning of “killing.” I was looking at a lot of games back then, and I saw these messages like “You’ve defeated 100 enemies!” or “Eradicated 100 enemy soldiers!” in an almost gloating manner. But when I thought about it in an extremely calm state of mind, it hit me that gloating about killing a hundred people is strange. I mean, you’re a serial killer if you killed a hundred people. It just struck me as insane. That’s why I decided to have the army of the protagonist in Drakengard be one where everyone’s insane, to create this twisted organization where everyone’s wrong and unjust. I wanted to weave a tale about these twisted people.And then we worked on Nier…We created this game called Nier, and after the world experienced the 9/11 terrorist attacks and the war in Iraq, we were being bombarded with updates on terrorist organizations and activities even in Japan. That’s when my opinion changed. The vibe I was getting from society was: you don’t have to be insane to kill someone. You just have to think you’re right. So that’s why I made Nier a game revolving around this concept of “being able to kill others if you think you’re right,” or “everyone believes that they’re in the right.”"-Yoko Taro

Jacman99 • 1 year ago

Wow I see. Thanks for commenting that message on this episode specifically instead of any of the episodes before since it fits so perfectly and it would have been a spoiler hint otherwise

I've separated myself from the game in these cases lol. After all, people can be sane and insane at the same time lmao.

Zuko Todoroki • 7 months ago

chad

go1 • 1 year ago

About anime:
They didnt animated the most beautifull scenery of this amusement park stage,they skipped all of it,including peacefull goliath tank and welcoming confetti... :/

Billy Bob • 1 year ago

it becomes like any war where countries send nice young boys into the battlefield to kill to stay alive on the behalf of older men and children / womenfolk. They were innocent til forced to kill to stay alive and to just follow orders. That's how you have incidents like My Lai and broken solders returning home where they can never be the upstanding citizens they were before (people that don't commit crime and kill people). The ongoing propaganda that the soldiers are just and those other people over there aren't humans stop being pushed.

In Vietnam, the soldiers were welcome back w/ attacks of 'baby killers' etc. when no soldier ever asked to be there.

PettankoLovingCunnyseur • 1 year ago

If you have to dehumanize someone to kill or enslave them, then you're just weak. See the Dark Brotherhood from the Elder Scroll series or the Longinus Dreizehn Orden from Dies irae. They know that they are in the business of death but fully embrace it. Fuck, LDO soul collection appears to work in the sense that souls more intrinsically valuable to the killer are worth more than those that aren't.

That's why during the prologue, Eleanore clarified that killing their former Waffen-SS comrades resulted in more power than killing Soviets. That's why I take no pleasure in killing machines or undead. I prefer killing people. Oftentimes, in RPGs, there are weapons that do bonus damage to the dragons, the living dead, etc... Spare me all that junk.

Give me weapons that do bonus damage to humans and other "enlightened" races (which, in the case of most high fantasy, also includes elves). FYI, in terms of enslavement, in Morrowind, House Telvanni is pro-slavery with none of the racism, so they have no qualms about enslaving fellow dark elves. They figure, if you're pathetic enough to get yourself enslaved, then you probably deserve it.

Jacman99 • 1 year ago

What did I just read

PettankoLovingCunnyseur • 1 year ago

Something beyond your reading comprehension, apparently.

Jacman99 • 1 year ago

Funny you think I have reading comprehension issues. Let me break it down for you.

1. "That's why during the prologue"
Prologue of what? Nier Automata, Elder Scrolls or Dies Irae? For your sake, I will assume you were referring to Dies Irae, but this is still unclear.

2. "Eleanore" and "Waffen-SS"
Who or what even are these? You didn't explain what or who they are. Do you expect people like me who has never seen these names before to know what you're referring to and therefore understand what you're talking about? Because not everyone is going to know what you're trying to communicate unless you explain it.
Perhaps some writing comprehension issues?

3. "That's why I take no pleasure in killing machines or undead. I prefer killing people."
As someone who has no idea what you're saying, all I'm seeing is how you prefer to kill people over machines etc. So allow me to repeat myself:
What did I just read

4. Your first paragraph talks about how you're weak if you dehumanize someone to kill or enslave them, which makes perfect sense since this is in the context of Nier Automata. But then you go on so many random topics like "soul collection", "Eleanore", "Waffen-SS", your killing preference of your victims, video game weapons that deal bonus damage to dragons, what kind of weapons you would prefer, racism in Elder Scrolls Skyrim, etc.

I really hope you look at this objectively and kinda see what I'm getting at here

PettankoLovingCunnyseur • 1 year ago

1. Yes, prologue of Dies irae.
2. Yes, this presupposed Dies irae knowledge, but because I dropped the name, if you were interested, could you have researched yourself. Disqus blocks my external links, so I couldn't post anything even if I wanted to.
3. Yes, I often find it stupid that in a lot of JRPGs, you fight "monsters", instead of human enemies, as you would find in something like The Elder Scrolls series. Obviously, Fire Emblem is the exception.
4. Yes, all I wrote presupposes knowledge of those series or the ability to do that research (again, I'd link, but Disqus prevents me).

Makaveli Musolini • 1 year ago

You mean false flag hopefully, otherwise you're young, dumb,or both.

Agissea • 1 year ago

so his world started with 9/11 ? No war before anywhere on the planet ? (or none that matters to him (or that hinder his life with inflation or whatever) so it doesn't exist ?)

Guest • 1 year ago
MeguminExplosion • 1 year ago

Taxation is not theft... Dont be that guy and then complain about roads, potholes, infrastructure being crap. Schools with no teachers, etc. Nothing is free. Tell every country with free healthcare taxation is theft and theyll laugh at you in free healthcare.

With that said, corruption tends to siphon funds from much needed projects to useless projects that line pockets of the elite. When taxation is done right you get Sweden highest quality of life.

Mega-Chad-Type-Hero • 1 year ago

The use of Force (upon others) is always coercion.

America also did very fine & well to be able to not only be able to support its entire infrastructure and support its entire population all the way up until the 1900s, but, that was also all done with only 3% or even less taxation.

Now enter : «All Wars Are Bankers Wars» (preferably the video of that title uploaded by High Frequency Radio on BitChute)

And Sweden ? You might want to find out about what Stefan (a guy from Sweden) who has both YT & BC Channel's named Sanity4Sweden has to say about what has been going on lately with Sweden (and everywhere else that the MSM refuses to discuss).

Also Enter : «The Grace Commission Report of 1985» (this was issued/ordered by former U.S. President Ronald Reagan to find out what the $$$ from the income-tax is actually paying for; turned out that NONE of it pays for roads, schools, hospitals, bridges, teachers, infra-structure, etc).

With 70+ years worth of technological-progress and scientific-advancement, just from America alone and not even counting other countries (corporations) land-masses, the «productive-capability» for being able to provide absolute-abundance for literally everybody on earth should be sky-high, yet, both spouses work full-time/over-time just to be able to earn ends-meet, homelessness numbers into the literal millions (and growing), crime-rates have only increased, knowledge is easily accessible & abundant yet the masses still choose to be willfully ignorant, inflation makes «saving» economically worthless, etc. I know why this is the case, but, damned if anybody «important» (according to the system) will bother to listen (well, one guy in government I have encountered will do as I instruct, who was a former State's Attorney, but, that is something more of an exception).

MarkZ • 1 year ago

Idk about bank wars, nor crime rates rising, because overall in most of the developed world they HAVE been on the decline, at least up to 2020... But overall everything is simply a government, control and authority problem, because the government and some retarded authority is ALWAYS involved to some extent in nearly all fields of life and business today. With no exception pretty much all problems are of the government, people who blindly support it and other authorities, and personal ignorance and reliance on the system, trusting it, and participating in the pointless game of politics, the majority believing that it CAN work somehow, and that THEIR representative CAN/WILL solve problems with the power of coercion (government) when in fact coercion and discarding your will and power to a central body (the government) FACTUALLY can't work even on paper unless that entity is literally a living god, who, i hope you know don't exist in reality. Yet you speak of these problems, which i do give you credit for seemingly researching on, understanding and processing... Yet still revert to trying to solve with the useless tool of government and state people...

Guestman Jack • 11 months ago

Governments are formed, because the moment you live with many others beyond yourself, and there are limited resources as well as other's well being to consider... It reaches a point where you just cant live peacefully without a solid consensus to follow.

People just can't act freely without worry about others, because every action got consequences, and the best way to get the good ones is if there was something that actually enforced the good in an orderly fashion.

Small communities may be capable to operate with a sense of "common sense" and may thus not need a fully fledged government to work as everybody just do their roles on their own... But the problem with that, is that the bigger a community is, then the more people that dont share this "common sense", will be part of it, which can lead to instances of the majority either actinng unfairly and/or the minority sparking trouble cause they crap on the majority's standards.

Humans arent just self thinking beings, we are also social creatures. Society cant survive without harmony, harmony cant exist witout order, and order is next to if not impossible to enforce without a ruling body that regulates things.

Governments just tends to be flawed, because mankind is as flawed as they are devisive in terms of how they want to live.... But unless you want to live in a no mans land where everybody are only in it for themselves, people generally will gravitate towards getting order for a stable life.

MarkZ • 11 months ago

A single consensus to follow for everyone doesn't work, both because such a thing cannot and WILL NOT ever exist, because government and its participants are always above the law, because there's many countries that will never unite, and if they will, it will lead to nothing but tyranny. Creating government is simply creating an alternative religion and royalty which WILL have their interests and resources they'll fight over, both with the people and other countries, the very thing you supposedly want them there to prevent... It also bases on the extremely naive assumption the government does, and CAN know what's good for a country and its people to begin with... And no, the people do NOT decide that, not directly or indirectly, if in theory, and maybe even at first you CAN hold the government in a tight leash, the strings get torn and cut in no time, with the only influencers becoming the government themselves, their friends, family, corporations and wealth holders, NOT the people or the good for everyone, the people meanwhile lose one right after another and everything slowly gets worse, which is EXACTLY what you see with EVERY country right now, regardless of what variety of democracy or other ruling systems they practice.

THE ONLY way to have a government without everything going to shit is having it small, and very tightly regulated, without the ability to grow and spread, which will also never happen because as they said 'the price of freedom is eternal vigilance', and not only is everyone NOT willing to always be vigilant, they often don't know what to even LOOK OUT FOR, nor educate themselves for that to be the case. And even then differing opinions will always exist, which means the control will always muddy and loosen, the government will grow, and get out of control. That was the basic idea for the US, also behind the separation of church and state and the French revolution, which all definitely brought a TON of progress, but NOT because those are amazing solve all ideas, but because of the BASE idea of government limitation, which almost no one seems to understand outside of theory at best, and even that rarely.

'Common sense'? There's not TEN PEOPLE ON THE PLANET that fully match up on that concept. As such, even within one country, no law will ever work the same for all people in all similar cases between all judges, policemen and politicians. More than that, there's no COMMON SENSE or internal logic to a lot of these laws. Are drugs legal or not? No. Unless you get doctor approval, then yes, for some stuff, for others its not, even if its medicine approved in other countries and that works. Are drug SUBSTANCES legal? No. Unless its alcohol or Tabaco, or some other shit, then yes. Unless there's prohibition law, which means that yesterday it was legal to drink your beer, the next day you'll go to jail for it or be beaten or even killed if you resist, and the month after that it's perfectly legal again because prohibition ended! How's the moron smoking pot at home or simply in possession of it more dangerous than the utter asshole DRIVING while DRUNK which can AND WILL kill people? Well, you see, he just is, so, you can get only up to a year for DUI, while 1-2 years for SIMPLY POSSESING over 4 ounces, up to 10 years for over 5 lbs, the same as for FIRST DEGREE MANSLAUGHTER. Makes sense? Nope. But its how it is.

How about a ticket? Does it make sense to KILL or DESTROY people's lives over it? Because THE GOVERNMENT will keep multiplying your debt of a ticket or tax and escalating if you keep refusing until the worst possible consequences. Meanwhile WHAT happens if you owe someone you know 5$-50$ but refuse to pay in a normal society? The same people you say are too violent, unruly and insane to do without a government? Well, that person will remind and bug you until either you give in, or they decide 5$-50$ isn't worth it, and he and his friends won't lend to you again regardless. That's it. What's more 'common sense'..? What happens if you continuously insult the leader/very respected person in your community meetings? AT WORST you'll be banned from participating. What happens if you LIGHTLY insult a judge over a minor case like say non damaging car accident at a parking lot? YOU GO TO F-ING JAIL for up to like 2 years. Now, did you hurt anyone? Did you ENDANGER anyone? Why can you go to jail for 2 years for calling a supposedly respected lawyer guy in a costume names, but DRIVING DRUNK can barely land you half of that? CERTAINLY its FAR MORE common sense to fear and punish endangerment of others more than someone running his mouth..? Nope.

Government are also supposedly 'civil servants'... If THEY are the servants, why do THEY get to decide how much YOU pay them (which is an absurd percentage by now) and their (now ABSOLUTELY EXTORBATANT) salary? Government is not about order, or law, people ARE capable of maintaining law and order by themselves in many ways, that's the beauty of humanity - we ARE able to negotiate and solve problems... Government is about creating a class of elite royalty snobs, and a religion of a supposed superhuman entity that can do what people can't (provide law and order), and supposedly do it better (which it cannot, as demonstrated here and in MILLIONS of other examples... no to mention EVERY function of the government CAN and often WAS filled as well, OR BETTER in the free sector. plus we ALREADY have a wide net of completely voluntary interactions, and always did). Government not only brings MASS disorder and instability, and 'legal' criminals, but organized governments are also responsible for FAR MORE murder, theft, oppression, violence, starvation, war and other horrors than any kind of supposed anarchy historical bogeyman (which barely even existed to begin with), more than that, the tendency of smaller and fewer government and its correlation with better lives, happiness and prosperity of a country all throughout history, at least if you do the fair thing and account for technological development (which was also BOOSTED during those times btw). Government is not the one and only way to have law and order, nor is having an organized community and society 'government'. Government is a useless leftover of darker times where we had no knowledge and having leaders who where better at something was a very crucial productivity boost, but NOT nowadays when everyone can learn, have and share ANY knowledge they wish, use it to solve nearly any problem, alone, via service, or communally.

Mega-Chad-Type-Hero • 1 year ago

Alright, I suppose I can agree with most of this, but, Systemic «Problems» are due to flaws in the system itself. Just like there is such a thing as the Placebo-Effect, its opposite is the Nocebo-Effect, and, wise people (not that anybody whom most people actually heed possess any real «wisdom») should be able to come up with & design Systemic-Solutions. And I was not referring to reverting to using the tool(s) of government/state, but, merely mentioned an experience that I had when dealing with all of those idiots in the system; the system itself is in control, like a HAL 9000, rather than anybody acting as a captain or manning the ship, thus, even if someone followed my instructions, properly, for making things better, when the time comes that they end up being replaced by someone else, that someone else will be just as dumb & ignorant as all of the other statesmen who also tend to be dumb & ignorant, then, the problems will just return all over again since it is really the «satanic texts» within the «law» books that need to be burned, and, instead, replaced with a wise system of peace-promoting TRUTH rather than all of these Military Industrial-Complex deceptions & war-mongering adversarial-systems.

MarkZ • 1 year ago

You can try and come up with systemic solutions, but the system is, or close to the mathematical system of dividing by 0. Aka, good people in the system might get SLIGHT improvements, normal and incompetent people will keep things the same or make them worse, BAD people, who WILL eventually come and grab power at SOME stage, WILL make things FAR worse (aka overall tendency is STILL tending toward 0). As per war, its just a way to reset social obligations, lower the consumer base and those that resist, potentially grab a hold of some new resources, lower social demands and expectations, and get people to accept more tyranny. There's no amount of war mongering that will be sufficient in a free market to get people to go to war due to them being individuals under such systems. Under government, let alone a monopolistic, powerful government, they don't even need to be asked, and the war can be financed with money printing that's done with currency devaluation over time, future obligations and other crap people never really sign up for personally nor have control over. Just one more reason government always goes south.

Ariel Gomes • 1 year ago

"Tell every country with free healthcare taxation is theft and theyll laugh at you in free healthcare."

Heres a line 100% written by someone who's only experience with this is what they've been told by some left wing agent. I live in a country where we have free healthcare and guess what? Anyone who can will still use private healthcare because free healthcare is terrible. Just like the roads, schools, or most things provided by the state.

Private companies have monetary incentive to provide good services. Public companies don't, and therefore end up as wildly inneficient, terribly managed money sinks more suited for money loundring than anything.

So please get out of your bubble before you claim to know how people think. Plus, taxation is theft by definition. Any argument you can make otherwise is utilitarian

Jullian J. Weskier • 1 year ago

You must live in a corrupt country if social systems arnt effective.

JDC • 1 year ago

my wife is in greece and her family, friends and everyone I've met in greece while living there for a few years generally agrees taxation is theft. So idk where you are getting your info from but the actual people living in free healthcare society says otherwise. The wait is long, you need to schedule a month beforehand for a public hospital check up. There's under the table bribing of doctors to get better vip treatment for patients as well. There is no free lunch. they are getting 50-60% taxed off their income, its so bad that employers just state their after tax monthly income in job listings and the average wage a month is 500-600 euros for an average blue collar worker and on the higher side its 1000-1500 euros for doctors and IT field etc... Considering their living cost is already their whole month's salary they have no disposable income to increasing debt compared to most Americans living in America earning an average 37k a year salary with health benefits paid through employer. Just sayin, live where you think the grass is greener before boldly claiming the grass is greener with no real weight behind your words.

MeguminExplosion • 1 year ago

Wait till you find out you lose your house and savings and debtors come after you for 1 major medical treatment and now youre homeless and still paying back debt. Then you declare bankruptcy and ruin your credit therefore making it impossible to own a home and now you pay someone elses mortgage for the rest of your life. Live like a dog slave.

JDC • 1 year ago

My dad has had multiple major medical treatments, its called health insurance. No one lost anything. You literally put in the worst possible situation where the person has literally nothing to cover them. Anyone in the world would give their left nut to live in America. But i'm guessing we need to ship some people like you out to china or russia and experience the genocides(uyghyrs), restricted free speech and monitoring/censoring/making people disappear and you can understand first hand why your socialist ideals are shit. I came from a communist country, its absolute dog shit, you have too much first world priviledges.

Jullian J. Weskier • 1 year ago

… you were just complaining about tax is theft. But flex about INSURANCE!? Of all things? Youre trolling right?

MeguminExplosion • 1 year ago

Weird flex. Just because you suffered doesnt mean others should. Grow the f up

Jullian J. Weskier • 1 year ago

You got your info from… individuals with an opinion. So their no better than Tucker Carlson.

MarkZ • 1 year ago

Taxation IS theft. Arguing otherwise is like arguing that gang 'roof money' is not extortion. The principle is exactly the same, the level of voluntarism is also exactly the same (none) - the extortion of money in exchange for living 'on their turf' and some imaginary or half imaginary services you have no actual choice in receiving or 'receiving', with punishment and escalating violence being the only alternative... Or leaving, except with governments, such bandits control the whole world now so you don't even really have THAT choice with governments.

Also, 'laugh in free healthcare'? Yeah, with their crazy high taxes and said healthcare being pretty mediocre, as well as getting worse by the year like all these social net services always do, and people like you only seeing them functioning in the short term and considering it functional, when the actual due date to prove their functionality and sustainability counting in DECADES... And another side price for these being declining birthrates, rising depression and suicidal, and rising taxes with declining free times and opportunities (like you can clearly see by now in Japan). Its like getting a million loan from the bank and flaunting how well off you are with all the expensive crap you've bought, when in reality you're WORSE off because the bill IS coming, and with percentages too. But yeah, such people and their yes men like you WILL laugh at you when you tell them this, because its fun in the moment, and/or thinking how horrible things can get when that bill WILL come is unpleasant and scary.

F-G • 1 year ago

Laughs in free healthcare.

The simple idea that taxation is theft is really one of the most baffling insanities that Anglo-Saxons society members can spout with a straight face. I'm always amazed.

Yes, all modern societies live on credit, but guess what, that's always been the case. The big difference is that globalisation made money flows way bigger than they should have ever been, making the entire capitalist system stand on shaky and unknown ground. But oh surprise, countries with high taxation have the same level of debt as countries with low taxation, though surprisingly, they don't get the same level of social benefits.

I don't know why you wouldn't call basic healthcare and hospital costing thousands of dollars anything but theft.

Seeing taxation as theft is also quite simplistic, as one can easily turn the argument around by implying that Capital holders are stealing the production of workers. Corporate Taxation is a mecanism to prevent this theft from getting too big and allows the State to redistribute unjustly gained benefits to go improve the life of all, instead of only contributing to a few.

Though redistributive systems are heavily flawed, with corrupt elites that indeed make the situation worse as decades go by, I sincerly pity anyone that thinks a system like the US is an improvement, as its just as worse. The Anglo-Saxon lie of the American dream or "we're all going to make it" is the best way to keep unaware laborers in the illusion that their system is fair.
It's all but that, and each time people criticize taxation for redistributive measures, I will Laugh in Free Healthcare .

Kunare • 1 year ago

Taxation is theft. I'm not from the Anglo sphere I'm from Africa and even here people know taxation is theft. The services they keep saying they provide are mediocre and most of the time the money just gets laundered and no services are provided. If taxation was not theft people would have the choice of not paying or at least choose what they are paying the tax for.

Xix • 1 year ago

People that say taxation is theft dont seem to know that money has no value by itself. You could go for a 0 taxation system and have the government just print all the money they need. But the inflation would be so high that people would start to reject the curreny, and accept different forms of payment instead. The inflation would not just sky rocket from the government printing all the money they want but rather from the fact because the government prints all the money they want.

Allso I never understand why people that live in a first world country still cling to idea's about no taxation. Did you ever concider that if your 'idea's' would be implemented things would not become only worse but even your own live would become unsustainable.
And if you say your 'first world country' live allready sucks. Try living in a second or third world country instead and see how that's like.

Or how about studying economics first before stating uneducated crap opinions. Your never going to convince anyone when your just pretending to know something when you hardly know anything.

Jullian J. Weskier • 1 year ago

Yep.
What baffles me? China out Capital-ism-ed the US back in 2011. In economical growth, ya. Theyre still a dictator socialism like the USSR was, but the USSR even accepted McDonalds.
The government tries to provide the best it can. But corruption is a thing. And people in the US are too stupid to know that you can turn in every purchase receipt for a year on tax returns, and get x100 times their returns on taxes. But they dont and just get the allocated amount by your paystubs.

MarkZ • 1 year ago

China 'out capitalism-ed' the US because the US dropped anything resembling capitalism back in 1913, and it was fully dead by the 70's with the heavy implementation of green policies, business regulations, heavy taxation and simple IMPOSSIBLE welfare and worker benefits, while China, all the way up to 2010~ from when they opened up to business was ironically MORE free than the US and the west with taxation and regulations, also had free shipping worldwide due to other countries covering the costs due to its recognition as a developing country in the world post union. Lower worker wages, unlike what the Marxist economists like to say where just a bonus.

MarkZ • 1 year ago

Money printing is a tax on savings so its still taxing. Also it implies the government's monopoly on money is a given, which the US proves doesn't have to be the case, nor SHOULD be (well, US prior to 1913).

And i live in a second world country with EXTREME taxation btw, and yeah, it'd be way better without taxation too. Taxation and money printing is tied to government monopolies on business, personal life, and money. "Study economics"? Well, clearly you didn't, because the BIGGEST historical economic success is the US prior to 1913, and they had the LOWEST tax rates and tiniest government in history to that point. And 'coincidentally' where also BY FAR the most successful. Though i guess you can use the slavery excuse, but that requires the ignoring of all the OTHER countries with a ton of use of slavery that remained shitholes despite how 'productive' slavery is, for example the middle east (which practices slavery to this day btw)

Jullian J. Weskier • 1 year ago

Thats a personal country issue. Nordic countries bring AMAZING free health. Same with here in japan

MarkZ • 1 year ago

3...2...1... NOPE.
If something worked/works for a brief period of time it doesn't mean its sustainable. The timespan of proving your statement true is about 4-9 DECADES, not a decade or two. And since you brought up Japan, well, hope you're not stupid enough to think its sustainable when the birthrate and healthcare system is ALREADY collapsing with the birthrates and everything else... The anime C covers it pretty well - you tax people and invest in the present too much, and you sacrifice the future (children, suicidality, national debt).

Jullian J. Weskier • 1 year ago

What? Our healthcare system isnt collapsing. XD wtf are you talking about. You must be one of those people that listen to US Rightwing media

MarkZ • 1 year ago

Pff, even if it was you wouldn't know because the concept of math is unfamiliar to you people. You sound like those rare tards that got a decent inheritance while having a shitty job, but instead of a normal investment, use it as collateral for a mortgage to buy a Ferrari, and when ridiculed answer with 'WHAT? POOR? ME?? Dude i have a Ferrari!"
Yes you do. Also a million bucks of mortgage while getting 30K a year. Do you even know what SUSTAINABLE means and what long time perspective is..?

Jullian J. Weskier • 1 year ago

Ma’am this is a Wendy’s

MarkZ • 1 year ago

No, this is Patrick

Jullian J. Weskier • 1 year ago

Ima eat ur snatch

depends. some sweed fams in my assssssssssian country fled to my tax haven-ish country to escape taxes.

dunno why we talking about taxes in a robutt animes' comment section though.

Justin Posey • 1 year ago

this entire thread should be on reddit and not on an anime website where most of us are trying to escape the shitty real world, tho obviously you have the right to say whatever the hell you want.... but acting like the shit you say is automatically correct compared to a slightly different version of how someone else see's it who lives in a different area is ignorant... we have the right to have differing opinions without arguing or name calling over it... but hey I'm just a former cog of the US military, so I also was used in helping my country, even if I didn't think the OP was right, I did think the lives of the people fighting beside me were the most courageous of humans. All so you can complain about taxes and paying for private healthcare... when we can't even get proper healthcare/treatment through the VA.....

yeah, im not the OP. im not a sweed complaining about euro taxes. why are you replying to me about it?

i was forced to enlist in my asssssssssian country , full time for over 2 years and paid less like 300 USDs a month for my trouble(plus over 10 years part-time in the reserves), almost starving on some days, and barely able to pay the bills... while "local business" keep complaining about us being lazy basterdz who "cannot work one"... while my country's gov imported over 2 million migrant workers(mostly commie china) , flooding the jeb market and lowering our wages.

so fuck you, vetman. and complain to someone else who can help you, 'cause i sure as hell can't. sorry, not sorry.

Astolfo-kun • 1 year ago

Rip the 2 robots that wanted to watch the play

vovan1 • 1 year ago

As expected of 9Ass!

Divine demon GOD Aris • 1 year ago

robot oyakodon

Wasa B • 1 year ago

Had me 😟 for like 10 mins